Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivek Kumar Pandey


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. I am open to userfying this article on request. Deleting it currently as consensus, based on commentaries of policies and guidelines, is for deleting this article. I shall request new editors and ips to kindly read up on Deletion discussions before commenting in the future. It will provide them information about how to put across an argument forcefully. Please also read up on what constitutes consensus on Wikipedia. Please contact me on my talk page for any future assistance. Thanks.   Wifione    .......  Leave a message  04:18, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Vivek Kumar Pandey

 * – ( View AfD View log )

(Past AfD information:Articles for deletion/Dr. Vivek Kumar Pandey) A (so far) unremarkable scientist, the section "Responsibilities and research he carried out so far" in whose article is completely unsourced. What sourcing there is elsewhere in the article is somewhat desperate. I don't doubt that he was Honored by having his name included in list of "TOP 100 SCIENTISTS 2010" of International Biographical Centre (IBC), Sponsored & Administered by International Biographical Centre, Cambridge, England (an imprint of Melrose Press Ltd. Registered in England (No) 965274). Not written by, but perhaps related to, the User Dr. vivek Kumar Pandey (contributions). He's young; perhaps he will go far. Hoary (talk) 00:13, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  —Hoary (talk) 00:19, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —Hoary (talk) 00:21, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 7 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Clear delete with a grand total of 2 cites on GS and at least one of those a self-cite! Xxanthippe (talk) 02:16, 7 August 2011 (UTC).
 * Delete Nicely formatted, knows his wikimarkup. Unfortunately, that's not enough. --Crusio (talk) 07:27, 7 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep the Artcle he is worthy of the wikipedia article and for his detail see the web link: . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.199.149.2 (talk • contribs) — 117.199.149.2 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep Article about vivek pandey is good to find here. He has got proud of past honor Allahabad university in academic field in very early age among 42 members also IBC scientist 2010 award is going to make him notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.199.149.2 (talk • contribs)
 * Do not delete Artcle is about the person who initiated his study from the place where was no facity at all for Oceanic Research. The Centre becomes the permanent centre of the university with Faculty in 2009 while enrollments in D.Phil was possible since begining. Pandey got first D.Phil from that centre which was not expected by this project mode centre due to local politics. Pandey worked on Indonesian Throughflow using POM model and became first on from India in the field.Dr. Pandey is not only academics, scientist but social and cultural person which is well know by most of the person. I gone through the wikibin page of Dr. Pandey and found him a Noble person of the world as comment described. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.211.83.245 (talk • contribs)
 * Original and Notable Article It is not recreation but original article motivated from the wikibin article on Dr. Vivek Kumar Pandey and near about 300 comments on the article. Kindly consider the influence of the wikibin article page . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kook2011 (talk • contribs) — Kook2011 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep it on the wikipedia I have read the reference and comment on wikibin of Dr. Pandey and found him notable. added by 117.199.146.116 (contributions) — 117.199.146.116 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete per nom and Crusio. Beagel (talk) 11:34, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Quite notable person Keep the article as permanent article of wikipedia. I found no doubt on Dr. Pandey's Notablity. Added by 117.199.144.213 (contributions) — 117.199.144.213 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment If this piece at "Wikibin" is "Pandey's major reference", as Kook2011 claims, then Pandey is in trouble. It's pretty easy for anyone to have an article there. As for the comments on the Wikibin article, they're hilarious (where they're comprehensible). -- Hoary (talk) 13:00, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * keep it The article is notable according the wikibin comment. Dear Hoary why pandey in trouble. Please do not spread such words. Added by 117.199.149.232 (contributions)  — 117.199.149.232 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete, only an Assistant Professor, minimal citability in GScholar, fails WP:PROF. Nsk92 (talk) 13:25, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - THere are bunch of sockpuppets here uh? He fails WP:PROF, Wikipedia is not a curriculum vitae and he has no impact or has reached controversy enough to meet the GNG, the references provided are academical however my major's tutor has greater number of scientific published articles, but this isn't a reason why I should create his article. Eduemoni↑talk↓ </b> 15:53, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: No sources have been found that show that these sockpuppets are correct. Joe Chill (talk) 17:46, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong delete - No sources that meet guidelines were found on Yahoo and Google. SwisterTwister   talk  21:05, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. The sources are adequate to verify the facts stated in the article but not to show notability. There is no evidence that he passes WP:PROF nor WP:GNG. I removed two "Who's Who" type vanity scam awards from the honors section; that sort of thing in an article here is less an indication of notability than the opposite, and should be removed per WP:BLP as an embarrassment to the subject. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:53, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * No doubt in notability Dear user Nsk92 Iwant to say that Tathagat Avatar Tulsi is also Assistant Professor contract while Dr. Pandey is permanent Assistant Professor. I have seen his blog written by name Jai Hind Pandey which shows his cultural, religious and social impact and thoughts
 * Delete. No evidence of significant achievements, but strong evidence of fervent attempts to promote that individual, both from reading the article and this page. Materialscientist (talk) 05:32, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep it. Dear Hoary, I created the article not fully based on wikibin article but I have no doubt on his notability as per my best knowledge. I point you 1. he is written topper in 96 UP BN Jaunpur under Varanasi Group NCC in 1997. He is honored with a historical university’s Alumni Association “Proud Past” among 42 persons list. He is honored by IBC as Top 100 Scientist. He has done remarkable work on Indonesian through flow as 1st of Indian  Scientist and also he worked on Indian Ocean variabilty. His cultural and social approach and behavior is also remarkable. Without such influence no article can get 321 comments most in favor of Dr. Pandey as per my knowledge this is highest commented article in wikibin sources. If in your knowledge any article got more that 321 comments in wikibin sources then let me know.

Thus I finally want to say that wikibin is only not a base of the creation of article but sure so many comments in favor of him and his fame in IISc, Bangaore due to involvement in Bhagvat Group, cultural activities and his personality as Project Associate made me to decide a notable article on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kook2011 (talk • contribs)
 * Notable article and keep it Dr. Pandey was well know figure at IISc Bangalore during 2007-2009 and therefore a large number of students (Male and Female) commented on his wikibin article. Rishikesh Pandey and others still remember Dr. Pandey — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.211.83.245 (talk • contribs)
 * Note to closing admin Please note that 117.211.83.245 has voted multiple times and, in addition, from the edit history of this debate it would appear that this IP and User:Kook2011 are one and the same person. --Crusio (talk) 08:57, 8 August 2011 (UTC)--Crusio (talk) 08:57, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep the Article The article is notable one and should remain on the wikipedia. The IP may be same if there is Cafe. The matter should count. I strongly recommend this Notable Article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.211.83.245 (talk • contribs)
 * Wow! I'm almost starting to become convinced. A whole cafe is behind him, this must be somebody notable! --Crusio (talk) 09:36, 8 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Notable article:Vivek Kumar Pandey Should remain On wikipedia (An event occurred in April 2000:“Shiksha Par Shaitan Ka Saya”- under main heading Aparadh - Kashi Hindu Vishvavidyalay (BHU), India Today, edition 21 Jun, 2000, 36-37)Dr. Pandey was scout traing holder during B Sc. education and in the text event at BHU he participated in Hospital Activities on the day before examination and in funeral activities on the examiation day on the request of HOD Physics, BHU in suicide case of his junior. He used to involve in cultural and social activities from begining of the education and also was a briliant student in over all carreer. You can find his foot step in all education centre where ever he pass out from Purvanchal University to IISc Bangalore. Faculties at every institute know him well. In Allahaabad he was used by Prem Chand Pandey for building KBCAOS, IIDS, AU, Allahaabad although he was able to find higher education from USA. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.94.116.131 (talk • contribs)
 * Delete. No evidence of notability. Fails WP:PROF. Salih  ( talk ) 16:00, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article is notable and should be on wikipedia. Vivek was the person who conducted science faculty final students mess (strength near about 2000) in Ramkrishn Hostel in his busy schedule of M.Sc. final study on request of students. This made him popular in BHU because the mess in Ramkrishna was best mess in all facuties mess except medical students mess where charge were too high even BHU IT mess was bellow in Rank of mess. Dr. Pandey offered PDF at FSU, USA, Stevens Institute of tecjnology, New York and GFDL when he was at CAOS, IISc Bangalore this was due to his skill in ocean modelling using POM. I could not found any good scientist who have so many experience with good in field of science also. For the example he is also First of first of batch assistant professor at KBCAOS with 1st D.Phil. All these character defined in the comments on deletion of the article and 321 comments on wikibin article which is highest commented article say that Dr. pandey is notable person of the science field.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.241.128.250 (talk) 04:50, 9 August 2011 (UTC) — 117.241.128.250 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep this notable article. Pandey is notable person of science and society. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.211.83.243 (talk) 06:26, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep . Dr. Pandey has done very good research work on Indonesian throughflow using very basic facilities at KBCAOS, IIDS. He refined himself at CAOS, IISc Bangalore and contributed also Indian Ocean Variabilty. He developed high-resolution regional model of the north Indian Ocean, based on MOM4 with Matt Harrison of GFDL, Princeton at CAOS, IISc Bangalore — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.211.83.243 (talk) 09:00, 9 August 2011 (UTC)  — 117.211.83.243 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep. Vivek sir has done first time analysis of GODAS of National Centre for Environmental prediction (NCEP) using Indian Ocean RAMA conservationism data and find the clear signature of Indian Ocean dipole (IOD) in 2006 and this article is presented in the international conference. perhaps that article is in process of publication. Apart from these scientific activities he is a noble human being. I request admin to keep the article on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.199.154.226 (talk) 09:36, 9 August 2011 (UTC) — 117.199.154.226 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * keep.Article is notable on best of my knowledge. He is good scientist, academician and best human. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.199.145.118 (talk) 10:00, 9 August 2011 (UTC)  — 117.199.145.118 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment to IP !voters To all the IPs that are participatig here, please realize that !votes from anonymous users that have few or no other contributions to WP will actually have the opposite effect from what you are hoping for. AfD is not a vote, your arguments will have to be based in policy (WP:GNG, WP:PROF, and WP:BIO). Note also that "notability" in the WP sense has nothing to do with being "noble", "good", "bad", or whatever. It's just an evaluation of the sources that are available to construct an encyclopedic article. Wikibin is not an acceptable source, so please come up with something better. --Crusio (talk) 10:09, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep this notable article. Pandey has 1st time done the work of comparison of GODAS, NCEP and ECCO2, MIT data for Indian Ocean and find that the GODAS performance is the better that ECCO2 using RAMA and TRITON observational data and this important work is published in e-Journal of Earth Science India. Therefore the article is well written and comprehensive matter is given about pandey. Thus artcle in this format is in the best form and also rating of the article is near about 20 and grade is 5 means 100%. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.118.94.60 (talk) 14:52, 9 August 2011 (UTC) — 115.118.94.60 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete. GS h-index of 1 and no other claim to WP:PROF make this an uncontroversial case. The sockpuppeting/canvassing here is becoming deafening. Agricola44 (talk) 18:35, 9 August 2011 (UTC).
 * Keep. Based on the matter in article of the person, comment in this debate and rating of the article I came on conclusion that admin should close the debate and  keep the article on wikipedia forever. The pandey's paper search which is available on line in the google say that he has contribuuted as main author in the papers on Indonesian Throughflow, data analysis and seasonal, intraseasonal and Interannual variability of Indian Ocean.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.199.149.73 (talk) 04:15, 10 August 2011 (UTC) — 117.199.149.73 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Article is not controversial. The detail given about him in the debate is some part of his life. I providing some web links where his some papers are available: Indonesian Throughflow and Data Analysis on Indian Ocean Variability     . Scientific person knows that the from a ground zero facility (at KBCAOS) to a modelling study how much difficult but Pandey has done struggle with circumstances and came to a good position in science community. I am satisfied with deletion debates on my creation and rating of the article on my first notable article. I hope now admin will keep it because the article is comprehensive and suitable for wikipedia as per my belief. Kook2011 (talk) 07:54, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep . I do not know how admin will treat the references about Vivek Kumar Pandey which support the notability of the this article Kook2011 (talk) 06:21, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 1. Even when signed in as "Kook2011", you have already written a comment starting "Keep". ("Keep it. Dear Hoary, I created the article not fully based on wikibin article[...]") I have therefore struck through the word "Keep" at the start of this new one. &para; 2. You now provide two references. One appears to be written by Pandey, and therefore is not a reliable source. (If you don't understand this, read "WP:RS".) The other is in Wikibin, which nobody here other than you and the Indian IP numbers takes seriously. &para; You are doing nothing here to help the reputation of Pandey, instead, you are doing the reverse. If you have some new material from a reliable source, say so; if you don't, please stop wasting the time of other people here. -- Hoary (talk) 07:07, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Kook2011, I have reverted this edit of yours to your comment above, because another user (me, as it happens) had already commented on what you originally wrote. Please read this within "WP:TALK". -- Hoary (talk) 09:40, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Some more reliable sources. Paper presentation in Conference,paper on Antarctica, oceanographer.net profile and one online project being carried by his group
 * Accept. Due to the large amount of citation in various journals, academic work, relevance to the "origins" discussions, etc.117.241.129.3 (talk) 06:01, 12 August 2011 (UTC) — 117.241.129.3 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Notable. Article in this form is notable one. The matter in the article, discussions in this page and references are sufficient to prove notable.117.241.128.156 (talk) 04:39, 13 August 2011 (UTC) — 117.241.128.156 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Comment adding a, so refs may show up - Nabla (talk) 10:17, 7 August 2011 (UTC) &mdash; And moving it lower - Nabla (talk) 11:26, 8 August 2011 (UTC) This is fun... Nabla (talk) 10:21, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.