Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivek Nagul (4th nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 17:21, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Vivek Nagul
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable Coach who has never coached the first team in a Fully professional league of any famous Club neither has got significant coverage. He is just an assistant and there is no credibility to the source claiming his licenses which is mentioned in the article. He may someday become a head coach but as of today does not deserve a wiki article as Wiki is not for promotion- NOTFORPROMOTION. This article was proposed three times for deletion and the PROD, prod2 tag has been repeatedly removed by the creator of the article Currently fails WP:NSPORTS, WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annaprash (talk • contribs) 18:03, January 15, 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment Above reasoning is of the nominator of the third AfD, which I speedily closed as malformed. Safiel (talk) 01:46, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NSPORTS and WP:GNG. No experience as a head coach at a fully professional level. Safiel (talk) 01:51, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NFOOTBALL,WP:NSPORTS and WP:GNG. Not a famous person in the world of professional football and does not quality the notability criteria either.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annaprash (talk • contribs) 09:41, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - I have struck a duplicate !vote by, the nominator. GiantSnowman 10:02, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  10:24, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  10:24, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  10:24, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  10:24, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. — Jkudlick t c s 09:52, 17 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 09:56, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete – Has never managed or been the head coach of a club in a WP:FPL or for a FIFA tier 1 match, thus failing WP:NFOOTY. The one external link talks of him possibly becoming head coach of Mohun Bagan, but that obviously did not happen. The lack of coverage means the subject also fails WP:GNG, not just NFOOTY. — Jkudlick t c s 10:01, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete -Doesn't meet Wikipedia's inclusion standard. Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  17:20, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:NFOOTBALL as he hasn't managed in a fully professional league and he doesn't have any senior international caps. IJA (talk) 16:30, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Quick note This isn't the fourth time that this article's gone through AFD: it's the first. This, the third nomination, and the first nomination were all created by accident at basically the same time (see short discussion), and Articles for deletion/Vivek Nagul (2nd nomination) has never been created.  Nyttend (talk) 02:37, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not managed in fully pro league. RRD13 দেবজ্যোতি (talk) 10:56, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Player fails WP:NFOOTY as has not managed in a fully professional league, nor senior international football. No indication of any other achievements that have garnered sufficient, significant coverage to satisfy WP:GNG. Fenix down (talk) 13:20, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.