Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivek Pereira


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 19:09, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Vivek Pereira

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Amateur author who has published two books with no sign of critical review or commentary or anything at all in reliable sources; failing WP:AUTHOR. Also, its created by WP:SPA. I am also nominating the article about his one book for deletion over here as it also does not qualify WP:NBOOK. §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ {T/C} 04:53, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ {T/C} 04:59, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ {T/C} 04:59, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ {T/C} 05:00, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ {T/C} 05:00, 5 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. I agree with nom. There's no there there.  The one source cited is a review on what amounts to a wiki site that will publish anything.  Googling turned up nothing useful.  Msnicki (talk) 06:48, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:11, 6 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 11:53, 13 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:GNG irredeemably.  Fowler&amp;fowler  «Talk»  01:17, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.