Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivek Singh (entrepreneur)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:01, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Vivek Singh (entrepreneur)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

pr cruft, sourced to black hat seo paid for spam (ie. the Statesmen "inspiration hub" etc...) Praxidicae (talk) 16:40, 27 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Not at all PR cruft. DD News is PR cruft? DD News, Forbes India, Deccan Herald, Decan Chronicle are reliable and independent sources. Please check with your information. There can definitely be a scope of improvement but deletion is not a right action. Gradually the page can be cited and supported by even more sources by other users. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shubham Dhingra15s (talk • contribs) 16:56, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
 * article looks legit. what's the prob here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zandburners (talk • contribs)
 * Note: This post is the first and only edit of this account. --Hammersoft (talk) 00:15, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Significant coverage has been found in reliable sources. Disagree with Praxidicae. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shubham Dhingra15s (talk • contribs) 17:31, 27 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Verifiability: Verified Sources used. Please check ALL the references.
 * Original research: does not violates the policy.
 * Advertisement: No advertisement being entertained here, article is in a neutral shape.
 * Vanity: article not created by an editor for himself.
 * Hoax: article doesn't spread any hoax in any form.
 * Notability: Meets notability criteria, the said person discussed by Forbes, DD News, etc.. Shubham Dhingra15s (talk) 17:34, 27 September 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shubham Dhingra15s (talk • contribs) 17:19, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Neutral article. 1-2 links as mentioned above are doubtable yet the whole article is backed by strong reliable coverage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theshivabhar (talk • contribs) 17:57, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This keep recommendation is the first and only edit of this account. --Hammersoft (talk) 18:09, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment, Why abstract reporting for advertising here? Can you please justify? Credible, independent sources have been cited here without any intent of promotion or spam. And you guys are using phrases like "same constellation of spam". Why intentionally neglect the sources with high reputation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shubham Dhingra15s (talk • contribs)
 * Keep Good citations are there, a few can be further worked upon. More content should be added with proper citations.Demoticbullmat (talk) 08:16, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This keep recommendation is the third edit of this account. --Hammersoft (talk) 12:50, 28 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete, same constellation of spam sources as always. – Thjarkur (talk) 19:24, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, spam advertising User:Dhpage (talk) Dhpage (talk) 19:54, 27 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails GNG, pure promo CV-like article about unnotable subject. All sources are either "branded" posts aka simply paid advertising. --Infogapp1 (talk) 10:37, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment It appears there is an attempt to swing the balance of this discussion as if it were a vote (it's not) by the use of sockpuppets. Please be aware of WP:AFDSOCK. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 12:57, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. - hako9 (talk) 17:12, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. - hako9 (talk) 17:12, 28 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination and others' comments. No evidence of sufficient notability to pass WP:ANYBIO: Wikipedia is not LinkedIn. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 20:39, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not pass GNG at any level Spiderone  15:30, 29 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.