Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivek Vij


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 06:06, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Vivek Vij

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Google search does not turn up independent references to this surgeon. (Two people turn up, a surgeon and a dentist. This is the surgeon.)  It does turn up a lot of "vanity" hits on this surgeon. If the promotional peacock stuff were trimmed out of this article, not much would be left. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:29, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 15:51, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS  (talk |c|em ) 15:51, 27 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep As much as new articles which may not meet Wikipedia standards are deleted, we also forget that as an editor, deletion of articles is considered a final resort, that Is, when all maintenance tags placed on articles are left unaddressed, in this case, none until today, have been issued. I say the editor and article be given time to develop as we do not want to scare away new potential editors.

Celestina007 (talk) 16:54, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment - This is not a stub but a multi-paragraph article, and the author does not, in my opinion, need time to develop it further. However, if the author wants time to develop it further so as to pass notability, they may move it to user space or draft space, or request that someone else move it to user space or draft space.  If the author requests that I move it to draft space, I will move it to draft space, and will withdraw this AFD (since this is a notability AFD and AFD does not apply in draft space). Robert McClenon (talk) 01:33, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete for failing WP:BIO and WP:GNG. The article is totally unreferenced, especially for all of the listed awards. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:32, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: The subject fails WP:GNG. An online search of the subject doesn't show the subject being discussed in reliable sources.  Versace1608   Wanna Talk? 23:13, 1 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.