Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivek kumar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:09, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Vivek kumar
First person to have a blog does not count as a notable feature for me, but being an officer of Indian Foreign Service is definitely notable. The consensus is that Officers of Indian Civil Service are notable. But I am a little disturbed by issues relating to Conflict of Interest because of the Article History and the Contributions I request the editors to concentrate on the latter two issues.  Doctor Bruno   14:12, 30 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions.  --    Doctor Bruno    14:13, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This guy hasn't done anything close to meeting WP:BIO since there's no evidence of renown or notoriety as a blogger. Blogging a bit isn't enough. And I don't believe in any assertion that junior government officials are automatically notable. Biographies of government officials deserve equal treatment with other professions, so professional renown (or notoriety) has to be earned. Mereda 15:24, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable enough. Blogging does not qualify to WP. IA (talk)  16:25, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable, as any civil servant doing his job is unless something really out of the ordinary is alleged, which it isn't. Emeraude 18:43, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. From his blog: "I agree almost completely with the discussion on Wikipedia to delete the entry on Vivek kumar." utcursch | talk 12:27, 31 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.