Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivekananda College of Technology and Management


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  11:30, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Vivekananda College of Technology and Management

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No refs with a before. Zero notability(NSCHOOL) Vikram Vincent 04:30, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 04:30, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 04:30, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 04:30, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Accredited, degree-awarding tertiary institution. We have always kept these by consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:52, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * This editor is talking about some nonexistent consensus. Several AFDs where they have !voted keep have been deleted. Unless they come up with proof to support their "consensus" their vote needs to be ignored. Vikram Vincent 10:07, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I believe it's a reference to WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, which says "Most independently accredited degree-awarding institutions have enough coverage to be notable, although that coverage may not be readily available online." &rsaquo; Mortee  talk 22:26, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
 * All these institutions are only affiliated to a university and do not award degrees themself. Also, as per WP:NSCHOOLS, "All universities, colleges and schools, including high schools, middle schools, primary (elementary) schools, and schools that only provide a support to mainstream education must either satisfy WP:ORG, general notability guideline, or both. For-profit educational organizations and institutions are considered commercial organizations and must satisfy those criteria." These are for-profit and hence are not exempt from satisfying W:ORG or WP:GNG. VV 03:59, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * That's as may be. I haven't tried to assess this myself, so I haven't !voted. I was just pointing out what there is some actual text behind what was saying. I looked it up because they've been an admin for 15 years so I was surprised to see someone saying their !vote had to be ignored as invoking a "nonexistent consensus". I thought I'd share the link in case it was useful to other participants. &rsaquo;  Mortee  talk 04:15, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Consensus can change per . If you were to look at the delete stats, you will see that the consensus has moved to deleting non-notable private tertiary educational institutions which do not have RS. I think following the existing guidelines is a better approach and then changing the guidelines when necessary. VV 04:38, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 13:51, 31 March 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per nom. Wait, that means "I agree with the listed reason", right? I hope it does, because I've used this on, like, seven AfDs so far. AdoTang (talk) 17:42, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 10:14, 8 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete as per Vikram (honorable mention to his/their enormous experience in AFDs of educational institutions). Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 01:51, 16 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.