Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  keep (withdrawn by nominator). Re-closing for clarity (non-admin close).  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 06:27, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies seems to be the violation of CSD.G11 and is based on only primary sources. C ute st Penguin ''' {talk • contribs} 14:44, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 5 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - Article Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies is nothing more than a means of promotion on Wikipedia as well as it is lacking the fundamental policy of references and sources. Contents in the article such as Institute Address and Faculty is such an example. Where at the most of places Citation is needed or either fulfilled by unsupported primary links.  D Mi  &#8482; 15:22, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Recognised degree-awarding institution. We invariably keep these. Being a bad article is not a valid reason for deletion. That's cleanup. -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:23, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - There are lots of institution in every conner of the street it does not mean that they hold a meritorious reorganization.  C ute st Penguin '''  {talk • contribs} 10:02, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, it does, per long-standing consensus and precedent at afd. Degree-awarding institutions are considered to be notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:00, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - I agree with CutestPenguin, Wikipedia is not a place for advertisement.  IN  Panda   Talk 10:17, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment. Copyedited and cleaned to remove advertising. See how easy that was? Much easier than nominating for deletion! This nomination and the opinions above simply demonstrate a sadly common misunderstanding of afd, which is for deletion of articles on non-notable subjects, not for cleanup. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:57, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - This article was more of an advertisement before your edition and cleanup, but even after your contribution to this article the references is lacking. Wikipeida require evidences and support of reliable sources where this article have "0" references. C ute st Penguin '''  {talk • contribs} 11:27, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * No, for degree-awarding institutions proof of existence is generally all that's needed. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:04, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment. It seems rather odd to me that all three of the delete votes come from accounts that were created at more or less the same time and edit in very similar fields. May be a coincidence, but needs to be highlighted I think. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:04, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment- In your recent edits you have removed most of the contents from the article Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies. You are not aware of the conditions of fraudulent in the countries like India. One of the world's famous Amity University and IIPM was charged heavy plenty for offering UN-approved courses. My concern and cause of nomination for deletion was lack of references. I will withdraw my deletion request, please help me by adding references. C ute st Penguin '''  {talk • contribs} 12:59, 7 July 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.