Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivian Full


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:52, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Vivian Full

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:BASIC for lack of available reliable sources. - MrX 12:23, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:TOOSOON. WP:NACTOR is marginal with one significant role in a film with no article and a significant role upcoming. Others are minor roles. Only passing mention in sources so WP:BASIC not met. One award and one nomination for an award. No Wikipedia article for the award itself and I am uncertain whether or not the award itself is notable. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:09, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Geraldo Perez, except that subject is a full WP:NACTOR fail (not marginal), and is an almost certain WP:GNG fail (e.g. no mentions in Variety or The Hollywood Report) as well. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:21, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:43, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:43, 17 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a place where every working actor is automatically entitled to an article just because they exist — the article must be supported by reliable sources which verify something that constitutes an WP:NACTOR pass. But apart from one-off guest roles in TV, all she has is one significant role in a direct-to-DVD film, which is not enough. And neither are the Joey Awards a major film or television award for which a win or a nomination counts toward NACTOR — they're a PR event staged by a promotional organization for young actors, not a real industry award remotely equivalent to the Oscars or the Emmys or the Canadian Screen Awards. And for sourcing, what we have here is a press release and the PR award's own website about itself, which is not reliable sourcing. No prejudice against recreation in the future when there's more substance and better sourcing available, but Wikipedia is an encyclopedia about people who have already attained notability, not a free PR platform for publicizing aspiring future notables. Bearcat (talk) 19:31, 20 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.