Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivo V2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 08:49, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Vivo V2

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

What makes this product (phone) notable? I couldn't find any review in an outlet that seems reliable and not just blog advert or a rewritten press releases. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:04, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose The Vivo V1 was covered pretty significantly, so I just figured it's successor should have a page as well. I dunno. Thanks, EDG 543 (talk) 16:09, 18 December 2019 (UTC)


 * WP:THEREMUSTBESOURCES, WP:NOTINHERITED. I am not seeing any significant coverage of the V2 model, but if you see it, please link it here and ping me. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:38, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  94rain  Talk  04:44, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 16:07, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with nominator. I tried finding some sources myself but failed. But there seems to be a lot in different languages. If anybody finds a couple in different languages, I'll change my vote. Also, reviews of it might just be covered up by all the product sites selling it. Sam-2727 (talk) 02:29, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Right, but we can't assume WP:THEREMUSTBESOURCES. Sources should be the start point of an article, not an eventual goal. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:49, 30 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Can't find any non-trivial or acceptable sources to establish notability for the device. Note that Vivo devices are largely absent in any English-speaking market I can think of (except for maybe India?) so English-language sources are likely to be few and far between. Given that the device is approaching 4 years old, I don't see that changing in the future. – Erakura (talk) 01:47, 2 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Additional comment: Looking again at the article, it mentions Verizon Wireless, a US carrier; I'm fairly knowledgeable regarding the US market phone industry and I'm not aware that VZW has ever carried or supported a Vivo product. So I also question the veracity of this article's content as-is. – Erakura (talk) 01:53, 2 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.