Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vix and the Kix


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to We've Got a Fuzzbox and We're Gonna Use It. and merge. The article has been redirected; knowledgeable editors are encouraged to merge relevant and verified information. seresin ( ¡? )  22:43, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Vix and the Kix

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

48 ghits when quote marks are used, does this indicate notability, also this article does not indicate notability in any shape or form Jay Pegg (talk) 12:05, 23 October 2008 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:20, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No notability outside of having a member of another band, fails WP:RS. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 16:23, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge Information should be pared down and added to article on We've Got a Fuzzbox and We're Gonna Use It. Jeremiah (talk) 20:08, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Update I've moved the first paragraph of this article (with minor editing) to the article on We've Got a Fuzzbox.... Jeremiah (talk) 20:17, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect: The band does meet the basic guideline of Criteria for musicians and ensembles number 6: "Contains at least one notable musician". However the band is not yet notable enough in itself and as the Fuzzbox article already contains information on Vix and The Kix merging it is somewhat pointless. A redirect would be better and fits into the rest of Criteria for musicians and ensembles number 6: "note that it is often most appropriate to use redirects in place of articles on side projects, early bands and such, and that common sense exceptions always apply." Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:04, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 17:23, 28 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep or merge and redirect. It satisfies MUSIC criterion number 6, so there's no valid reason for deletion within policy. I would prefer a keep. The referencing may be mangled, but there are reliable refs in the article. - Mgm|(talk) 21:41, 28 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.