Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vixens


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  21:11, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Vixens

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Has already been PRODded, there are three sources on the article (two in external links), an encyclopedia about anime that I'm unable to access to see the extent of the coverage of Vixens in it, an in-depth review from Mania, and an in-depth review from Monsters At Play, the latter of which doesn't seem like a reliable source to me. I was unable to find any additional sources, and I don't think this meets notability guidelines. Waxworker (talk) 22:36, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Waxworker (talk) 22:36, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Waxworker (talk) 22:36, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:39, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:40, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I have a copy of The Anime Encyclopedia:
 * "Visionary. 1995. AKA: Vixens. Video. DIR: Teruo Kigure, Taiichi Kitagawa. SCR: Ryo Saga. DES: Tomohiro Ando. ANI: Tomohiro Ando. MUS: Masahiko Kikuchi. PRO: Knack, Beam Entertainment. 30 mins., 45 mins., 30 mins."


 * It then gives a 100-word-in-total summary that describes the premises of the three merged episodes. — Goszei (talk) 22:43, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:40, 30 May 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak Keep per Goszei and the Mania article. Appears to be notable. Link20XX (talk) 03:22, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 23:43, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Per Link20XX. Sourcing is poor but it is enough to meet WP:GNG. Jumpytoo Talk 04:41, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. If another encyclopedia has an entry on the subject, so should we.4meter4 (talk) 21:08, 14 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.