Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vj jenny o


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 23:03, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Vj Jenny O

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

subject fails GNG and NMEDIA as a media person —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 17:37, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Don't forget to delete redirects -- VJ Jenny O. and Vj jenny o -- as well. Quis separabit?  14:48, 9 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as per above, also copyvio in the linked video material. (citations and links removed)  ron az Talk!  17:42, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 17:39, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 17:39, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Media-related deletion discussions. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 17:39, 28 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep as has received Nigerian press coverage as a television presenter and as a singer, references in article, passes WP:BASIC Atlantic306 (talk) 01:16, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Search results bring up press release about her songs and music video appearances from blog-like music outlets which I think is not enough to establish notability.—Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 21:45, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * The newspaper sources in the article seem reliable. Atlantic306 (talk) 21:55, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Those sources are press releases from primary and non-independent websites except this one on Vanguard—Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 22:19, 30 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep per Atlantic306. Stanleytux (talk) 19:33, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as per above 'Keep' arguments.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 14:45, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment WP:NMEDIA states the depth of sources has to be considered. There is a certain lack of depth in sources used in this article.  ron az Talk!  18:34, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Digital penetration in Nigeria is pretty low compared to other developed countries. Many national media houses even find it hard to maintain their online identity. I believe there is sufficient coverage for this article to remain. Never heard or listened to her songs though, she is probably a C-grade/list musician in Nigeria. Darreg (talk) 13:11, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment Point taken, can't say I agree with the lack of digital penetration. But what about the copyright violations in the linked video?  ron az Talk!  18:56, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I didn't get to see the video, not that it will make much difference though, my understanding of AFD is that it is meant to ascertain if an article is notable for inclusion on Wikipedia, and not really about if there are copyright violations really. My !vote was strictly based on the references I was able to find on her, not about the state of the article. Darreg (talk) 12:53, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

AfD isn't a vote, so copyright violations do matter. :)  ron az Talk!  10:33, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * It depends on what you mean by "votes". What I do know from my experience here is that consensus is guaged based on number of superior arguments and not just a "majority vote". Darreg (talk) 12:55, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
 * We're talking about the same thing :)  ron az Talk!  15:19, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   12:51, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: copyright vios; mostly OR and publicity-pushing. Don't forget VJ Jenny O. and Vj jenny o as well. Quis separabit?  14:48, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep: per keep votes. Darreg (talk) 13:06, 13 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.