Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vladimir's Sobor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Possibly leaning towards keep; in any case there's no consensus that deletion is necessary. The rename seems reasonable. Olaf Davis (talk) 00:15, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Vladimir&
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Yet another incomprehensible gibberish generated by User:Superzohar. Ghirla-трёп- 15:31, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Poorly written and fails to cite any sources.  G S Palmer (talk) 17:46, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:00, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:00, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:01, 2 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Userify until properaly translated. At present there is too much untranslated Russian.  Peterkingiron (talk) 19:23, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:36, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Comment: Well, I think there's enough material out there to write an article on the topic. In English, it's usually referred to as the Vladimir Council, and any article on the topic should probably end up at that name.  The question here is whether this is sufficiently useful to retain until that article can be written, or whether this is time to break out the WP:TNT.  I can largely confirm that the current text is a machine-translated partial copy of the Russian Wikipedia article on this subject, which is itself in rather dire need of improvement and proper sourcing. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 02:57, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep and rename, adding sources e.g.  . IMHO this translation is a good enough draft to start from. – Fayenatic  L ondon 22:02, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 13:20, 18 April 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.