Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vladimir Anisimoff


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Reading Vladimir Anisimoff, it certainly seems like there should be an abundance of sources on this subject. But given that there aren't, I'm closing this as Delete. Should sources be located in the future, this AFD closure can be revisited. Liz Read! Talk! 00:16, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Vladimir Anisimoff

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Appears to be built on no reliable/secondary/independent sources and I'm unable to find any myself.  Aza24  (talk)   00:25, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Science.   Aza24  (talk)   00:25, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:31, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Businesspeople,  and Philosophy.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  02:27, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment. The Russian Wikipedia doesn't seem to have an article for this person, but it has articles on other people with this name who might be notable by English Wikipedia standards. See ru:Анисимов, Владимир Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:45, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * delete, though the article was created 10 years ago, there are zero reliable sources not connected to Anisimoff himself, and I can't find any in Russian. Artem.G (talk) 12:04, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Very Weak Keep if the article can provide reliable sources (per WP:RS), and be re-written to read like an advert (WP:NOTADVERT). If not, delete. —Mjks28 (talk) 08:39, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I have gone through the article and reworded a lot of it to sound less biased and impartial. It would be appreciated if other editors could go through and help make it neutral. Mjks28 (talk) 08:45, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your efforts, but these neutrality issues aren't really a concern for AFD. As you mention, it's the sources that are the defining factor here.  Aza24  (talk)   20:38, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete There are no RS on the page about the person except his own publications. My very best wishes (talk) 17:17, 25 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.