Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vladimir J. Konečni


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep as nothing else has been suggested here (NAC). SwisterTwister  talk  23:04, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Vladimir J. Konečni

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article replete with promotional language and peacock terms, created by a WP:SPA, with virtually all references being primary sourced to the subject's own work. It needs world class cleanup or WP:TNT. Guy (Help!) 12:30, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:54, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:54, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:54, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:54, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:54, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 12:54, 30 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:DINC. Is there any doubt that Konečni is notable? Joe Roe (talk) 14:46, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * See WP:TNT - notability is not the question, the issue is whether this promotional article entirely created by rather obviously conflicted editors, is the correct starting point. Guy (Help!) 11:16, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Good GS citation record. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:32, 2 September 2016 (UTC).

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  19:22, 6 September 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:26, 14 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.