Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vladimir Molerovic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A very slim NFOOTY pass, but a clear GNG failure being repeatedly recreated Fenix down (talk) 15:34, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Vladimir Molerovic

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Has been deleted numerous times in the last month. I can't find anything outside the unreliable sources used in the article (Instagram and Transfermarkt). Flashscore says he played once in the second tier of Bosnia, so looks to fail WP:NFOOTBALL. Can't see him passing WP:GNG. Has been sent to draft already but the page creator just recreates the article, defeating the purpose of it. Spiderone 14:29, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  14:29, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  14:29, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  14:30, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone  14:30, 1 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete and SALT - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 14:42, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bosnia and Herzegovina-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  15:06, 1 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Update - he does pass NFOOTBALL according to Soccerway but by the thinnest of margins. 51 mins in the Serbian second tier two seasons ago. I'll keep the discussion open in case anyone has any further comment on the sources available or doesn't think the Soccerway source is enough to keep. Spiderone  15:08, 1 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.