Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vladimir Sidorov


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 16:20, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Vladimir Sidorov

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Russians have an article about another Vladimir Sidorov. Seems that this one is not notable. The entire article is based on one self-published source - the own official artist's website. Searched a bit on the Internet about this person and found no evidence of notability. Even those claims about awards and prizes can't be confirmed by reliable sources, I think. XXN, 22:03, 2 February 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 01:50, 10 February 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:46, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. It takes a great deal of fame and a major recording contract to be considered a notable accordionist. Seriously, even if we could verify the claims in the article, it would not pass WP:MUSICBIO. Jack N. Stock (talk) 08:02, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:27, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:27, 22 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete nope, doesn't meet GNG or MUSICBIO. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:54, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. I have not found sources could make this one pass WP:BASIC or WP:MUSICBIO. — Sam Sailor 04:13, 26 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.