Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vladimiras Beresniovas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 18:42, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Vladimiras Beresniovas

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I was reluctant to nominate this as he may actually be notable but I'm not seeing any evidence and my searches found nothing better than this. If notable, it'll need familiar attention and improvement. I'm not sure how good your Lithuanian is. SwisterTwister  talk  06:17, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:28, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:28, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  07:28, 23 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - my Lithuanian is non-existent but I think he is notable, as he's definitely in the Lithuanian Who's Who (can't link to the page, but it comes up in book search) and I found the reference to him being honored by the city of Kaunas for lifetime achievement type thing. I cleaned it up and added sources.  —Мандичка YO 😜 07:38, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk  09:11, 30 August 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep per - Sources added & article's been significantly improved since nomination, Notability does seem to be there so Keep. – Davey 2010 Talk 20:35, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:10, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: I see this was relisted, and I don't really have much discussion to add to the above, but the points already made are valid, so I think in this case there is enough verifiable evidence of notability. --Slashme (talk) 00:38, 7 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.