Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vladislav Khalilov


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:22, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Vladislav Khalilov

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject of this article is not relevant to Wikipedia. ArkayusMako (talk) 14:17, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2019 September 25.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 14:30, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:33, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:33, 25 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. The AfD nomination was malformatted and the stated reason for deletion given by the nominator does not actually make sense. However, the nominator being a fairly new user, I think we should cut some slack here and to interpret the nomination as made on notability concerns grounds. On substance, the article is currently heavily promotional and relies only on primary and non-independent sources. There is very little in terms of citability in GoogleScholar. Even making allownces for the fact that most of the subject's publications are presumably in Russian, for a genuinely notable scientist with a fairly long career I would have expected a larger citability footprint. As things stand, the subject does not appear to satisfy WP:PROF, plus the current page is too promotional to be retained if a case for marginal academic notability can somehow be made. Nsk92 (talk) 16:53, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. GS citations are tiny, WP:Prof is not passed. BLP reads like a CV. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:26, 27 September 2019 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.