Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vladlen Vinokurov


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 22:36, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Vladlen Vinokurov

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:NFOOTY. XXN, 19:32, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. They do in fact meet WP:NFOOTY. He played on a team during years that was in a fully professional league. The Crazed Beast (talk) 20:41, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:19, 18 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - no evidence of notability, the only source does not work and therefore the claim he has played in a fully-professional league is not verified - fails WP:NFOOTBALL. More importantly, also fails WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 08:05, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:58, 20 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - as unverified. Given that the only claim to notability is not supported by reliable sources, this article does not meet applicable notability guidelines. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:51, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of NFOOTY Spiderone  08:15, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - there are other sources for his appearances, such as here Nfitz (talk) 02:12, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:BURDEN has not been met. Nfitz's source only highlights that there is no seeming in-depth coverage in reliable sources. A stats box with no written content falls incredibly short of WP:GNG. Mkdw talk 17:47, 25 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.