Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voafose


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  So Why  10:48, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Voafose

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable musician. Fails the general notability guideline and music notability criteria. - The   Magnificentist  12:04, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  19:29, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric  13:50, 29 June 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Article was relisted twice on 29 June--due to a bug in the script tools, the second relist caused the article to be commented out of that day's log and not listed elsewhere. Fixing now.
 * Delete Searches turn up usual selection of download and discogs-type sites, with only two possible RS results. Both are so short as to make significance doubtful.  Does not meet  either WP:GNG or WP:NMUSIC. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:48, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete minor artist, underreferenced for over 10 years now.. Staszek Lem (talk) 16:16, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Finngall  talk  15:52, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: fails WP:MUSICBIO.   Dr Strauss   talk   08:07, 4 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.