Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VocaLink


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep per availability of reliable sources. Someone should try to add them in, though. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 02:17, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

VocaLink

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Appears to fail WP:CORP. SchuminWeb (Talk) 10:11, 16 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Weak Keep. BACS is undeniably notable, and the page on the BACS website  seems to indicate that VocaLink is a major partner.  On the other hand, this isn't strictly speaking _third-party_ coverage.  If some can be found, it should be added. Tevildo (talk) 14:42, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 23 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Insufficient notability to meet guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:29, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Very Weak Keep. VocaLink is a subject worth having an article on - it is a commercial company but it does provide the FPS which is notable. This "article" however is more like a glossy pamphlet from the PR firm. What the heck does "This is complemented by value-added Managed Services that leverage industry expertise and technical capabilities" even mean!!? Grible (talk) 12:00, 24 April 2009 (UTC) (oops)
 * "You have to pay us extra if you want us to do any actual _work_ for you", in my experience of such corporate communications. :) Tevildo (talk) 19:02, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. Plenty of coverage in independent reliable sources found by Google News. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:27, 25 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.