Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vodei Multimedia Processor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Jennifer Aniston nude err... I mean Speedy Delete - NYC JD (objection, asked and answered!) 15:17, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Vodei Multimedia Processor

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unverifiable, no reliable sources available, non-notable software J. M. 06:42, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Apparently it comes down to three possibilities: An accurate article, an article that serves to direct traffic to the software creator, or deletion. After carefully weighing these possibilities, I'd prefer the first choice, however, as it has been explained to me that Wikipedia is not about accuracy, that is not a possibility. Option number two is in conflict with Wikipedia standards according to this page. It is then my alternative choice that the article be removed and blocked from being recreated until reputable sources can be found. Until then, if someone wants accurate information, they can frequent MultimediaWiki for Their article. Posting an article that conforms to Wikipedia guidelines appears to be incompatable with posting a truthful article in this case. With that in mind, this subject can do nothing but damage the reputation of Wikipedia.Qabala 20:21, 11 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete - no assertion of notability for this company software. --Mus Musculus 15:33, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Vodei Multimedia Processor is not a company. &mdash;J. M. 16:02, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Does having 557,000 results in Google and a bunch of forum discussions count? —Kn0wItAll 01:57, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
 * No. "Jennifer Aniston nude" has 2,130,000 results in Google.  Does that mean we need an article about it? Now excuse me while I go review the results. --Mus Musculus 14:25, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.