Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vodyanoi (Dungeons & Dragons)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Umber hulk. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 02:16, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Vodyanoi (Dungeons & Dragons)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

All info is redundant with Umber hulk. There are only three sources, all of them minor and WP:PRIMARY listings from books with dozens and dozens of other monsters. No indication that this meets notability guidelines. I Turned this into a redirect per WP:BOLD, but was reverted by who requests consensus. Grayfell (talk) 00:41, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  04:53, 3 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete if needed perhaps but certainly redirect to Dungeons & Dragons as this is obviously best connected to that. SwisterTwister   talk  04:53, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * ... and why would we put in a redirect to an article which doesn't even mention the term? Jclemens (talk) 08:46, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the section in Umber Hulk, where I note the nominator has been appropriately merging and cleaning up the entry. I think it's clear this subtype is not independently notable, but I am not entirely sure deletion of this page is legal, per WP:CWW, if we're to keep the content at that target, so it could be protected if disruptively unprotected. Jclemens (talk) 08:46, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect per User:Jclemens, above.Vulcan&#39;s Forge (talk) 23:15, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep or redirect per above. BOZ (talk) 03:54, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Umber hulk. The redirect should not have been reverted.  Primary sources can not establish notability, and there are very few hits on Google Books. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:58, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 9 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect and merge to Umber hulk, which is the clear target. This is basically directory entry as it stands. —Torchiest talkedits 14:33, 9 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.