Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VoiceBox Technologies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:57, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

VoiceBox Technologies

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Pure and blatant promotion for non notable organisation. Lacks coverage in independent reliable source. Sourced by themselves. Prod restore after request "I represent VoiceBox Technologies and we are curious as to why our Wikipedia page has been deleted (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=VoiceBox_Technologies). The page contained correct information about the company and was maintained by an internal company source." duffbeerforme (talk) 12:46, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:01, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:01, 15 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as by far another classic example of there only being tossed information and sources but there nothing actually solid let alone solid independent notability, nothing salvageable at all. SwisterTwister   talk  06:26, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Concur with nom. Should be completely uncontroversial, no notability. MB (talk) 02:43, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Un-notable and promotional.—azuki (talk · contribs · email) 00:19, 23 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.