Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voice and Speech Review


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Voice and Speech Trainers Association. Spartaz Humbug! 19:09, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Voice and Speech Review

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable journal. None of the listed indexing services are even remotely selective (and several, such as GScholar or Microsoft Academic Search, are simply trivial). One independent source, which is just an in-passing mention. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG, hence: delete. Randykitty (talk) 13:05, 3 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment Article was created by a SPA,, presumably the same person as the journal's editor-in-chief. --Randykitty (talk) 13:10, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Please delete it and put me out of my misery. Really, I’m not kidding. I can’t believe I’ve had to spend hours and hours (around 20 different edits) trying to put up 80 words about a journal. It’s absolutely absurd, and it borders on harassment.  I was just trying to do something nice, and I’ve never regretted anything more in my life. You all win. I will never dare to touch the almighty Wikipedia again, and I will be deleting my account. Congratulations.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rockfordsansom (talk • contribs) 13:15, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Greetings. Perhaps you should keep the text of the contested article and put it through the draft process. I'm sure you will find it most useful. As an aside, I had also created articles that were deleted. I learned not to get upset about it. I tried instead to improve my editing. Take care. -The Gnome (talk) 15:32, 3 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. Subject fails WP:NJOURNALS. -The Gnome (talk) 15:32, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 16:49, 3 June 2018 (UTC)


 * We've got a potential merge target at Voice and Speech Trainers Association. I'd rather see a merge, than a delete here. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:51, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
 * That was my thinking as well. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 03:23, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Merging is always to be preferred to deletion, provided there is something worthwhile from which to merge. -The Gnome (talk) 06:23, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment the Voice and Speech Trainers Association article has its own problems. A merge/redirect there (so long as that page exists) seems like a good option. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 05:28, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   12:09, 11 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.