Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voice of change


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirect - go forth and merge, my sons! -- Y not? 03:06, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Voice of change

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No evidence of notability; nothing of substance here that couldn't be incorporated into British National Party provided adequate references from reliable, secondary sources are added. Waggers (talk) 13:46, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge and possibly redirect if seen to be relevant to the article as a whole. Otherwise delete.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 13:53, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect to British National Party. -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 14:01, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. KurtRaschke (talk) 15:32, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect to British National Party. &#0149;Jim 62 sch&#0149; dissera! 23:19, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 21:58, 9 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  18:16, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  18:16, 10 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.