Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voices of the Lifestream


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy keep. This was possibly a POINTy nomination given a.) this AfD was the user's first edit, b.) the article is undoubtedly GA class, and c.) the arguments presented here don't really hold water. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells• Otter chirps • HELP!) 05:06, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Voices of the Lifestream

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Usual Wiki fancruft / non-consideration for inclusion in an encyclopedia / advertising. The article describes a fan-produced album provided as a digital download on OCReMix.org, which is an independent fansite that combines special interests related to music and video games. It's size and/or references really aren't a consideration here. It simply isn't worth mentioning in an encyclopedia no matter how you spin it. Shalot334 (talk) 02:39, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Strong Speedy Keep - The Good article status of this article is not a fluke, it has actual notability, at most you could argue for a merge somewhere, but I have to laugh at your claims of a total lack of notability. Did you look at the article before you nominated it? Judgesurreal777 (talk) 03:52, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep: Notability concerns were brought up and subsequently addressed on the article's Talk page over 4 months ago, including coverage from five professional game industry news sites, and praise from two professional game developers, including the Guinness record holder of working on the most professional video game soundtracks. This article also received Good Article status nearly 4 months ago. It sounds like your only roundabout argument in this nomination is "it's just unencyclopedic," which is clearly regarded as not being a substantive argument. I don't feel this AfD nomination holds any water. - Liontamer (talk) 03:45, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, well written article, notability established. J I P  | Talk 04:29, 1 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.