Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voidmstr's law


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  → Call me  Hahc  21  16:21, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Voidmstr&
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet the requirement for notability. Corey Glynn (talk) 16:03, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 8 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete, no evidence this term has been used enough to justify an article.TheLongTone (talk) 18:08, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Insufficient sources for notability. Nothing but a few casual references. Dingo1729 (talk) 23:39, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. An eponymous law that has not yet become notable. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:12, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Two references are provided in the article. Wired is a suitable reference. Wired Minds mentions the "law" only in passing&mdash;which does not support notability. The link provided from that page gives a "server not found" error. I could not find any other suitable sources to support notability. With only one appropriately supportive source available, the article's topic does not meet the requirement for notability. (Incidentally, WP:MADEUP does not apply here. The fact that the nominator has duplicated a link to the same guideline is further circumstantial evidence that he does not understand that guideline.) Axl  ¤  [Talk]  14:46, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note also that both sources are by the same author "toxic". My motive behind this nomination is to receive your input, not to demonstrate a knowledge of WP:MADEUP or any other policies. There's no need to sleuth for evidence of that which is so obvious. Corey Glynn (talk) 05:01, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.