Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voith & Mactavish Architects


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 16:59, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Voith & Mactavish Architects

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The entire page sounds like an advertisement, especially the "Awards" section which probably doesn't need to be in an encyclopedia. I'm not sure if this company is even notable enough to warrant an article. Capsulecap (talk • contribs) 22:41, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, Companies,  and Pennsylvania. Capsulecap (talk • contribs) 22:41, 28 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete, though there's nothing wrong with listing awards (these often confer some notability), in this case the awards are very local, or specialist. The company does not seems to attract a lot of notice for its work, therefore doesn't pass WP:NCORP. Sionk (talk) 23:04, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. The sources used are a mix of local/community or primary sources—nothing that immediately passes GNG (the Architect Magazine stuff seems like directories of projects, not specifically highlighting their work, and the copy reads like it was firm-supplied), and the awards might be notable but the sources detailing them don't indicate that. A search to find that content did not turn up promising leads. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs  talk 16:45, 3 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.