Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vojislav Dragovic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 21:20, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Vojislav Dragovic

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A footballer without source to sport he exist or made his professional debut. Matthew_hk  t  c  14:07, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - This article needs loads of cleanup, but sources can be found to prove his existance like this, this, this goalie competition, etc. D ARTH P ANDA duel 14:19, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Is source 1 copied from WP, or WP copied from source 1. Source 2 says he hasn't played, source 3 is non-notable-- Club Oranje Talk 23:42, 18 November 2008 (UTC)


 * This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. GiantSnowman 14:28, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak delete for now. Now this is an awkward one. There's no doubt he exists, but has he played at a fully professional level? Some of the claims in the article have raised a few question marks. For example, it's claimed he played an instrumental part in FK Sarajevo finishing second in the Bosnian league, but according to the second of Darth Panda's links, he never actually played for them, and the claim he helped to bring Walter Zenga to Red Star Belgrade seems a bit fanciful too. I can't find any evidence of him making any first team appearances for Chievo neither. The bulk of links regarding this player seem to centre on this Free Kick Masters that he's involved with (along with some very notable players), but I don't know if that would be enough that see him through on WP:N grounds. So for now, it's a !delete from me. Bettia   (rawr!)  15:46, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Comment some source support that he played for Chievo youth team. But youth player is not notable yet. Matthew_hk  t  c  16:14, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. If this source is true, he "was elected as the best goalkeeper and player of the league while with Sarajevo," giving him inherent notability for winning a fairly large award. "Best goalkeeper and player of the league" is like winning an MVP award, in my eyes. D ARTH P ANDA duel 20:57, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * It certainly would be, there's no arguement there. I just find it highly dubious that a player could win Player of the Year after only playing half a season! Also, the claim that he only conceded 4 goals in 16 games is also rather dubious - the only season FK Sarajevo finished second in the league was 2005-2006. Looking at the full results for that season, it's clear that more than four goals were conceded in their last 16 games. There's so much here that just doesn't add up - as well as failing WP:ATHLETE in my eyes, this article also fails WP:V. Bettia   (rawr!)  09:38, 18 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per Bettia. пﮟოьεԻ   5  7  16:29, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Bettia. Govvy (talk) 20:50, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:48, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:48, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:49, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Bettia. GiantSnowman 21:50, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't believe he has met notability criteria yet. Main sources provided are unsupported except by WP which raises the question of chickens and eggs. Independant sources don't seem to support any claim to have actually played notably.-- Club Oranje Talk 23:42, 18 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.