Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vojtěch Huser


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:01, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Vojtěch Huser

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Insufficient notability for WP:Academic; article created and maintained by apparently COI editor whose only other substantial contributions are to Trialome. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:04, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: the COI discussion is at WP:COIN. Trialome is under discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trialome. I should also correct "whose only other substantial contributions" to "the majority of whose contributions" above. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:13, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable academic whose article was pretty obviously created for promotional purposes by, who has thus far avoided clarifying or acknowledging the clear conflict of interest here. -- [ UseTheCommandLine  ~/ talk  ]# &#9604; 01:14, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * *ahem* "clarifying [...] the clear COI". Can you say that? Is that a contradiction? Lesion  ( talk ) 17:25, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 19 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Citation record is too slim for WP:PROF and there appears to be little else. Academics at this early stage of their career usually do not pass WP:PROF and this one apperas not to be an exception. A clear case of WP:TOOSOON, made worse by the COI problems. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:08, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete-- per previous comments, notability + COI concerns. Lesion  ( talk ) 17:25, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.