Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Volabit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 09:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Volabit

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is particularly interesting. A company that appears totally un-notable, with most of the refs being basically mere notices in the usual bitcoin trade publication--but also a short article in the WSJr written by a regular member of the newspaper's staff, but being essentially just a PR announcement. Are they in the habit of republishing announcements of every new company formed in this area? Perhaps they are not quite as reliable a source for notability as we have thought.  DGG ( talk ) 00:04, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 00:24, 2 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as News particularly found some links but nothing considerably better. Pinging (you'll Eclipsed is listed at the history).  SwisterTwister   talk  00:28, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  00:29, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  00:29, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:53, 2 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:N. No indication of notability.  Ana  r  chyte   11:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete A couple of short paragraphs in one reliable source doesn't really meet the standard of extensive coverage. Nwlaw63 (talk) 17:35, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Insufficient coverage in WP:RS. This may become notable in the future, but for now delete. --Jersey92 (talk) 14:47, 6 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.