Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Volatility drag


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. &mdash; Deckiller 22:12, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Volatility drag

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

"Volatility drag" appears to be a neologism - only 143 ghits. WP:NEO is thus my only real reason for deletion. If someone can convince the community that this term is not a neologism, I think a merge with volatility could work. YechielMan 05:07, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge: I'm not sure this is a neologism. I think it's just a specialized term. As such, it should be merged with volatility.  . V .  [Talk 05:51, 5 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Possible hoax, definitely gobbledegook.  Edeans 08:50, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT, as the term is not noted on the page Volatility editors of that page may decide it is not relevant to the topic. Jeepday 14:47, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.