Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Volcano Vaporizer (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 00:36, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Volcano Vaporizer
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Deleted as spam by previous AfD, then recreated. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:32, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment This version does not seem irretrievably spammy. I suggest we concentrate on the notability of the topic. Skomorokh  01:19, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep -- what will they think of next? If there are competing similar devices I have no problem with merging them.  But if there aren't I have no problem covering this one here.  Geo Swan (talk) 22:30, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 9 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - This vaporizer has been featured in several reviews and the primary focus of several independent studies. It obviously passes notability guidelines. The advert template would be more appropriate than deletion. 03:22, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge references and culinary-usage info into Vaporizer. The Volcano Vaporizer article will not stand on its own merits if it is stripped of what amounts to advertising copy. There are many different vapourisers, even if we consider only those conceptually identical to the Volcano. There's no basis for each and every (or any particular) electrically-operated, forced-air, thermostatically-regulated vapouriser to have its own article, any more than there's a reason for us to have an article for the Lennox Conservator III forced-air gas-fired home furnace, the Carrier EfficiencyMax forced-air gas-fired home furnace, the Rheem DuraSave forced-air gas-fired home furnace, et cetera ad infinitem. —Scheinwerfermann T&middot;C 04:55, 13 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.