Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Volksmusik TV


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Ryan Postlethwaite See the mess I've created or let's have banter 04:24, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Volksmusik TV

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Possibly non-notable TV station, article created by the gentleman who founded the station. GNEWS shows no hits, a normal Google search shows only TV listings (to be expected) and anti-Scientology sites (Oliver Schaper is apparently a Scientologist). Please also see Articles for deletion/Peephole TV. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 01:51, 4 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment Please check your resources for your claim. Station has been in operation in Europe and Americas according to the RTR (Austrian Governmental Agency for broadcast licenses) broadcast permit, no major contributer for this article has been listed on official RTR documentation (see [www.rtr.at]) has been involved with the foundation of this station. Station is actively broadcasting and Google provides plenty of information on this channel.--70.1.174.14 (talk) 05:26, 4 September 2008 (UTC) — 70.1.174.14 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * But none of the information meets WP:RS. And there's an obvious conflict of interest here, whether the names are listed or not! Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 14:25, 4 September 2008 (UTC)


 * KEEP - Proposed deletion is poised by Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry seem to be based on his dislikes rather than real interest in this article. Google provides plenty of news reports which should be included.--Whereismycardude (talk) 05:40, 4 September 2008 (UTC) — Whereismycardude (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Stricken as sckpuppet Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 23:20, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I have no interest in the article. Never having seen the channel, or heard of it prior to this, I can't really say whether I like it or not. Google provides no news reports, as shown by this link: GNEWS Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 14:25, 4 September 2008 (UTC)


 * REMAINUK Admin looks for TV-Listings of an US based adult channel on uk-version of Google. Not even HustlerTV is listing their programming. What has the creation of the article to do with Scientology? If you have a problem with Scientology keep this opinion for yourself.Oschaper (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 08:35, 4 September 2008 (UTC)  — Oschaper (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * I'm looking on the UK version of Google, yes - but the UK version searches worldwide, as does the US version. I have nothing against Scientology - I know a little about the cruise ship problems (it's in my field of expertise) and the protests, but I certainly don't attend them. I was pointing out that the only Google hits for this TV station are either TV listings, or anti-scientolopgy sites, niether of which are reliable sources. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 14:25, 4 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete appears both non-notable and non-verifiable in accordance with Wikipedia Policies and guidlines WP:N, WP:CORP, and WP:V to name a few. Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:12, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Neutral Honestly can't decide  Spec  ial  K  14:16, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I have yet to see any WP:RS yet for notability.Groupsisxty (talk) 14:51, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * REMAIN Please pay attention that this site is part of the Wikipedia Germany TV-project (please refer to the discussion page).--Whereismycardude (talk) 17:16, 4 September 2008 (UTC) Stricken as sockpuppet Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 23:19, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
 * And who was it created by there? A user named 'Oschaper'. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 18:54, 4 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Agree with the assessment provided by in the nom, as well as rationale given by . The socking disruption in this AFD and another by the same user is also concerning. Cirt (talk) 06:45, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. This page is just an advert.  I would suggest merging it into Oliver Schaper, but his antics don't seem to have got him enough press coverage to merit an article yet.  --Hugh Charles Parker (talk - contribs) 19:00, 7 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.