Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Volley Firing Infantry Weapon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:17, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Volley Firing Infantry Weapon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable firearm; search in English found nothing - perhaps an French-speaker could help. Patents do not establish notability. Created by probable User:Ctway sock. ansh 666 06:11, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. ansh 666  06:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. ansh 666  06:12, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

DELETE...Dead end, one of a kind experimental weapons, with limited or no supporting references to establish notability do not meet guidelines. Also, enough is enough. I recommend that every page created by User:Ctway and socks be automatically deleted. It would save us the trouble of doing it one by one.--RAF910 (talk) 06:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. ansh 666  07:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Per WP:EVASION, creations by blocked editors can be marked for speedy deletion. If you can confirm creator is a sock....? GraemeLeggett (talk) 10:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * The article was created before the editor was identified as a sock and blocked (he had already created 30+ overlapping sock accounts before). However, I do want each of his articles to stand on their own merits since some are about notable subjects. ansh 666 01:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  17:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Just a prototype. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 18:37, 21 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.