Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VoloMedia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 03:47, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

VoloMedia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Created and maintained by SPAs for promotion. Article not neutral, company not well known at all. Rayman60 (talk) 00:06, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:32, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:33, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:33, 23 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - News only returned some trivial mentions and some blogs; Newspapers returned zero; Books also had some mentions, but nothing in depth; Scholar actually had some hits, but again nothing in-depth; Highbeam had some brief mentions and press releases.  Onel 5969  TT me 02:10, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Mostly trivial, borderline case. Coverage does not appear to be enough to warrant its own article. Jujutacular (talk) 19:40, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for now as although Books, News, browser and highbeam all found links but nothing to suggest better improvement. SwisterTwister   talk  04:09, 28 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.