Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voltz Clarke Gallery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 23:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Voltz Clarke Gallery

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject does not meet our notability requirements of companies, WP:NCORP. There is no in-depth coverage in reliable sources.

We have https://www.toryburch.com/blog-post/blog-post.html?bpid=132091 a blog, by a fashion label, not a reliable source.

https://www.architecturaldigest.com/story/bradley-sabin-flower-ceramics makes a brief mention: "On October 8 his latest botanical beauties go on view in New York City, at the Voltz Clarke gallery’s new Upper East Side location voltzclarke.com, promising the space a fabulously fresh start."

https://www.vogue.com/article/the-feminine-mystique-natasha-laws-works-of-art-on-view-at-maxmara-los-angeles has half a sentence on the subject: "We all got on so well and the idea of putting on a show out here just kind of grew,” says Law, who worked on both shows with Manhattan gallerist Blair Voltz Clarke."

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/holland-cunningham-at-vol_b_9685480 is by a huffpost contributor Madelaine D’Angelo the CEO of Arthena an art invement advisory firm, NOT an independent, reliable source

https://www.thecut.com/2017/06/landon-nordeman-first-looks-exhibit-at-voltz-clarke-gallery.html dedicates an entire sentence to the subject: " The new exhibition “First Looks,” on view at Voltz Clarke Gallery in New York, is the first showcase devoted to his fashion work." Vexations (talk) 20:47, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Vexations (talk) 20:47, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Vexations (talk) 20:47, 16 May 2020 (UTC)


 * delete for lack of significant coverage. Theredproject (talk) 13:50, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:26, 18 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete not notable. Beritagsier (talk) 19:22, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 15:20, 25 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.