Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Volumen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:41, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Volumen

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

fails WP:Notability_(music), no sources Dlabtot (talk) 01:18, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 04:10, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 04:10, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. - Mgm|(talk) 13:24, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment I added a reference. The band has been around a while and has had some success. If someone wanted to they could probably establish a good case for a weak keep. ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:18, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure if ink19.com meets the criteria of a published source in WP:MUSIC, but that review of their EP is something, at least. They are a really good band, but I don't think that counts in this context. Dlabtot (talk) 02:25, 21 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.