Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Von Briesen & Roper


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. bd2412 T 01:19, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

Von Briesen & Roper

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )
 * Article version nominated for deletion
 * Article version nominated for deletion

Fails to meet WP:GNG. Unable to find in-depth independent coverage in RS. WP is not a business directory. MB 18:41, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:34, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:34, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:34, 1 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Independent content added from external sources. Please advise of additional specific changes to avoid deletion. Rules of Engagement for similar biz types seem selectively enforced. Bbcaraher 18:41, 1 February 2019 (UTC) — Bbcaraher (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Wikipedia has few actual rules. However, the Wikimedia Foundation does have terms of service that prohibit undisclosed paid editing, which includes editing on behalf of an employer or client. Given the timing and specificity of your arrival and edits, I recommend that you review the WP:COI policy and take any appropriate action. Bakazaka (talk) 22:03, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * sources reliable but "local" - I've done some work on the article, cleaning up the existing citations and adding others, but I've had no luck finding national or international sources to support the article. That's not a reason to delete, though.  See this link for a diff between my last edit and the version nominated for deletion &rarr; https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Von_Briesen_%26_Roper&type=revision&diff=881356678&oldid=881308136&diffmode=source . --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 02:29, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DannyS712 (talk) 00:14, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP. Sourcing offered above is in passing and / ot WP:SPIP, insufficient for establishing notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:26, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per User:K.e.coffman. The article states "regional, national and international practice" but many law firms have national and international connections. This is just providing yellow page coverage and advertising on larger law firms of which there are probably multiple hundreds in the U.S. alone and likely thousands worldwide. Otr500 (talk) 18:22, 11 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.