Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voodoovelvet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-08 09:16Z 

Voodoovelvet

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Doesn't seem notable. A google search returned no third-party mentions. The book that's cited as a reference isn't enough since that's only a publication of art works uploaded to that website. BTW, I wasn't even able to fin her on artwanted.com Ok she appeared under the name Vu Velvet there, that's why I couldn't find her. Carabinieri 18:50, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Delete - seems non-notable, doesn't meet criteria for an article. Steve 20:13, 29 January 2007 (UTC)


 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, W.marsh 21:46, 2 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Definitely nn. Very few outside references on Google. Chairman S. Talk  Contribs  23:04, 2 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.