Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vordik


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:55, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Vordik

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is written only for company promotional and advertising purposes. References are very poor. No significant coverage by independent media. Nothing significant or notable about the company to be here. does not meet notability criteria. Light21 13:47, 18 September 2016 (UTC)Light2021 (talk) 14:55, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:07, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:07, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:07, 18 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom there's nothing here - David Gerard (talk) 15:33, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as this is all essentially PR; the article goes to specifications to actually not only state clients and connections, but to go from services to then mentioning the company's memberships. None of that is convincing and certainly not the accompanying sources, which are also PR. SwisterTwister   talk  03:00, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: After research, I can't find any WP:RS about this company to establish notability. Safehaven86 (talk) 18:39, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete No reliable sources to satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH. There is also no claim of significance either. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 06:09, 20 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.