Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vorondil


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 06:55, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Vorondil

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Yet another minor figure from a Tolkien appendix. Fails GNG. Tolkien wrote of a lot of notable stuff, but a lot of his characters aren't. Hog Farm (talk) 04:58, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator.--Jack Upland (talk) 05:40, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Redirect to Stewards of Gondor, where he is mentioned in the genealogy tree with the other stewards. Does not appear to have any independent notability. -- SamCordes talk 06:31, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Changed recommendation to Delete per discussion in Articles for deletion/Pelendur -- SamCordes talk 18:54, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - Extremely minor character that does not pass the WP:GNG. Searching for sources only brings up a few hits that only repeat the same one or two sentences worth of in-universe information about him.  Rorshacma (talk) 07:29, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 07:43, 1 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete I cite my argument from another discussion. &#8213; Susmuffin Talk 07:49, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete that this article has existed for 15 years is a sad commentary on Wikipedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:47, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:31, 2 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. The usual Tolkien fancruft with nothing but primary sources. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:00, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. The usual Tolkien fancruft with nothing but primary sources. Fails GNG/NFICTION.Kacper IV (talk) 12:14, 5 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.