Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vorshack


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:02, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Vorshack

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a hoax. One of the references (and its author) is untraceable, and the article contains inaccurate information (one example: the dwarven warrior Bard of Dale). Vorschack is apparently a dragon name in certain probably gaming contexts, but not in the contexts given. Several of the items here are only traceable to here (example: Sir Gerald Kingsley). Peridon (talk) 16:14, 2 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Dvořák as plausible phonetic spelling of a common mispronunciation of this name. Article as it stands is apparently made up, not notable, and unverifiable. JulesH (talk) 17:18, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Nice one! Peridon (talk) 18:24, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Vorschmack is better! NVO (talk) 13:05, 7 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Obvious hoax. Edward321 (talk) 00:46, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  Aitias   // discussion 00:04, 7 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete The article should rely on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. The article seems to be a hoax.--Ped Admi (talk) 01:09, 7 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-encyclopedic. Hoax. LK (talk) 08:20, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Rambling original fiction that violates WP:V. Deor (talk) 13:17, 7 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.