Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vote for pimp (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to 2014 Egyptian presidential election. Content may be merged from the history as necessary; no clear consensus for a merger here, but there is at least consensus this should not stand as an article, and a reasonable redirect target has been proposed. Vanamonde (Talk) 02:59, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Vote for pimp
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

per WP:SUSTAINED and WP:NTEMP, this was a trend in social media in 2014 and just a news story covered in many newspapers (WP:NEWSBRIEF), no historical impact nor importance. Ibrahim.ID ✪ 17:05, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  17:08, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  17:08, 10 December 2020 (UTC)


 * I am finding difficulty seeing how this is notable. Seems like some random slogan that has had little effect on history. I mean, 2020VISION doesn't have its own article. Perhaps a Redirect to 2013 Egyptian coup d'état would be better? Foxnpichu (talk) 17:29, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect with a selective merge to 2014 Egyptian presidential election, where the phrase is mentioned in the section "Endorsements and opposition". As the nominator states this twitter hashtag doesn't seem to have had any sustained coverage and doesn't seem to have any notability outside of the 2014 election. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 23:24, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes a Merge of Vote for pimp with 2014 Egyptian presidential election makes sense. The phrase has now been reduced to a nickname "The Pimp". All the content should be grouped together under one subtitle Vote for pimp. M. Hassan  talk here 08:41, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure that there's enough coverage of the twitter campaign to require an entire section of it's own, but there does seem to be a few bits of content there that would be worth merging to make a paragraph or two in the article on the election. If the nickname has become something that has attracted long term coverage throughout his presidency perhaps it would be worth adding to Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, perhaps in the section Abdel Fattah el-Sisi? 86.23.109.101 (talk) 14:14, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   20:39, 17 December 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:25, 25 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.