Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voter Awareness !!


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:50, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Voter Awareness !!

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Wikipedia is not a how-to guide. PROD removed by author.  Lord Pistachio  talk 22:24, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unencyclopaedic and seemingly copied from somewhere else. This topic is no doubt covered more properly already in other articles. The title is also unhelpful. The majority of the world's voters are not in Florida (in fact I'll bet that the largest number of them are in India) and don't need to have this drawn to their attention with two exclamation marks. --DanielRigal (talk) 22:29, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Is covered: Voting in the state of florida--Utinomen (talk) 22:38, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * That article actually looks like it should be deleted for the same reason. -- Lord Pistachio  talk 22:43, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Indeed. I just prodded it. --DanielRigal (talk) 22:46, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Beat you by a few seconds :D -- Lord Pistachio  talk 22:49, 14 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete I'm sure this is a good-faith attempt to add useful info, but it's far to much of a how-to guide for our needs. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  22:44, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete G3 - This is stupid.   Snotty Wong   speak 22:52, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * In no way whatsoever is this article vandalism. It is a good-faith attempt to provide information, but it doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards of inclusion. -- Lord Pistachio  talk 23:13, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but the two exclamation points in the title were enough for me.   Snotty Wong   talk 23:24, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Sometimes people who don't know what they are doing accidentally do things that look like vandalism without any malicious intent. I think that is the case here. --DanielRigal (talk) 08:45, 15 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. The essential part is covered in Elections in Florida, and the rest falls under a proposed (but unlikely to be accepted) speedy deletion criterion currently being discussed here. May qualify for speedy A10. --  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 15:40, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:11, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SNOW. Bearian (talk) 18:22, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
 * delete should have been speedied. SYSS Mouse (talk) 01:47, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.