Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voting Requirements FLVS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 00:25, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Voting Requirements FLVS

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unencyclopedic content; not suitable for Wikipedia. CJ Miller. (That's my name.Don't wear it out.) 01:18, 31 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment: Please be more specific, see WP:UNENCYCLOPEDIC. Yours ever, Czar Brodie (talk) 02:48, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:12, 5 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Delete as unencyclopedic. --Pstanton (talk) 02:13, 5 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep, no reason given for deletion. Insufficient to simply assert that an article (or the subject of an article) is not appropriate for Wikipedia (WP:UNENCYC). Yours ever, Czar Brodie (talk) 08:36, 5 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep Topic is probably encyclopedic and notable, but the article as it stands needs a lot of work. Might even be better to stubify. OTOH, needing a lot of work is not a reason to delete. LK (talk) 18:29, 5 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.