Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vougar Garadaghly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 18:50, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Vougar Garadaghly

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article appears to have been created by the person who is the subject of the article. Furthermore, a search for reliable, secondary sources reveals an insufficient amount of significant coverage. This article fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for academics. Neelix (talk) 15:20, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:18, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:18, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:18, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:18, 18 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Being a great-grandson of somebody is not quite enough. Xxanthippe (talk) 03:31, 18 December 2012 (UTC).
 * I don't think that's what the notability of the article is being based on. It appears there's something real there (just starting with the az: version of the article showing him giving a large press conference), but the article is so poorly written right now, that it's hard to tell if there's enough. -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 05:22, 19 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails WP:PROF, WP:ANYBIO, WP:AUTHOR, WP:GNG--Nixie9 (talk)
 * Weak Delete Subject may be notable in his native language, but that is not demonstrated by anything so far in the discussion, and is not verifiable by any means we who do not speak Azeri or Russian possess. We may need to stick in some sort of codicil to our notability criteria that reminds people that this is an English language site, so subjects so far outside the cognizance of the English-speaking world as to not have good sourcing on them in English might not be good subjects for English Wikipedia articles. So this might be closer to a fail of WP:V than WP:PROF. Ray  Talk 15:56, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.